Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Currently known quirks and issues with TICv8

General Issues

There are a number of minor issues, and quirks, which have been identified by the TSWG. Users should read this section carefully, before accepting TIC quantities at face value.

  1. Some stars may have reported stellar parameter errors that are larger than the parameter quantity. Users are cautioned against using these parameters in calculations for publications.
  2. Users are reminded that stars that have ecliptic latitudes between -6 and 6 degrees have their priorities set to zero. This “gap” in priority is meant to mimic the expected gap in camera coverage for the two year primary TESS mission.
  3. Some stars in the hot subdwarf list do not have errors for their stellar parameters. These were adopted ‘as-is’ for consistency.
  4. The disposition column identifies objects that are included in the TIC, but are likely spurious, or related to other TIC objects in a non-trivial, non-astrophysical way. Currently, this column is populated as a NULL, DUPLICATE (6), ARTIFACT (7), or SPLIT (8). When a single star in a previous TIC is found to be two or more actual sources due to the enhanced resolution of Gaia DR-2, the original TICID gets the disposition SPLIT. New TICIDs are assigned to the objects and the original TICID is in column DUP_ID (column 87). The original star “SPLIT” star will have NULL in the dup_id. The DUPLICATE flag means the star is listed twice (or more) in the TIC due to prior cross-matching difficulties. In this case, DUP_ID contains the TICID of the real star.
  5. Users should note the metallicity (column 69) has been adopted when available from a spectroscopic catalog, but it is not directly used in any calculation. This may result in physical parameters that are not strictly consistent with the reported metallicity.
  6. The listed RA (column 14) and Dec (column 15) are not measured positions, but positions which have been propagated to EPOCH J2000.0. Users should not try to propagate forward the TIC coordinates using the proper motions listed. Instead, users should use the original catalog position (column 119 & 120), proper motions (columns 17 & 19), and corresponding errors for propagation.
  7. If a star is identified as a subgiant, and a mass and log(g) are provided, users should not consider these parameters to be reliable, because the empirical relations designed to calculate the mass are valid for dwarf stars. However the luminosity and effective temperature should be accurate.
  8. Asymmetric errors are computed using a Monte Carlo method and are only provided for CTL stars which are not in a specially curated list. There are borderline cases where the peak of the property-distribution was too close to the validity-limit of the property-relation in order to compute reliable errors. These stars will have no or asymmetric errors for just some properties.

Joins

All stars affected are stars originating from TIC7 which did not get matched up with a Gaia DR2 star in TIC8. In all these cases, it turned out that there is a valid match between the TIC7 star and a Gaia DR2 star, and thus it is possible to update the older TIC7 values that eneded up in TIC8 with improved, Gaia-derived values, unless it is a star from a specially curated list, in which case the parameters are taken from those curated lists.

The following table summarizies the known cases.  These targets are identical and should have been matched together in TIC v8, but were not.  Users should be aware that these are the same objects, and thus parameters from the TIC8 ID under the "Gaia DR2" column can be associated with the same TIC8 ID in the "from TIC7" column. 

TOITIC8 ID (from TIC7)TIC8 ID (from GaiaDR2)Comments
454.01153077621651051509153077621 is a cool dwarf
573.01296780789876200724296780789 is a cool dwarf
722.013850990768493622738509907 has a spectroscopic Teff
1421.013292773722019613336Gaia photometry unreliable, RUWE = 41.2 (not ok)

Splits

In this case a star originating from TIC7 is an unresolved double-star in 2MASS and has at least two entries in Gaia DR2 that did not get matched up properly in TIC8.  All magnitudes (Tessmag, Vmag, J, H, K, etc) and stellar properties of the TICID (Teff, radius, mass, etc) are most likely corrupted and should NOT be used. How strong they are affected depends on the ratio of fluxes (e.g., the values from the TIC IDs corresponding to the resolved Gaia DR2 sources). IMPORTANT: Please note that there is no way to tell if any TESS signal came from a given star in the unresolved binary system.

The following table contains the original TIC8 ID (from the unresolved source in TIC7) and the two TIC8 IDs for the source coming from the Gaia DR2 IDs.

TOITIC8 ID (from TIC7 source)TIC8 ID (from Gaia-resolved source #1)TIC8 ID (from Gaia-resolved source#2)Comments
--92359852651667036651667038RUWE < 1.1 for 92359852 and 651667036 (ok)
1606.01125735470640763859640763860125735470 and 640763859 have similar properties
268.01219253008685340264685340263219253008 and 685340264 have similar properties
1014.0196246348772008799772008800772008799 is brighter, but too hot for stellar property estimation
1044.01463402815854828119854828120flags for 854828119 not ok, but ruwe = 0.93
--385105618642958052642958048flagged as multiple in TIC7, split now, spect teff

Artifacts

So far we have only one identified: TIC 269701145 (close to TOI 1339). This is an entry originating from 2MASS (20080397+6651023), sitting on an artifact around the bright star TIC 269701147. We know that this is not the only artifact in 2MASS and that they are prone to sit on diffraction spikes around bright stars. For TIC8 we had no time to find a safe way to sort them out without loosing bonafide stars.

TICv8 Column Schema - Executive Summary

Column Number

Column Name

Data Type

Description

Units

1

ID

long

TESS Input Catalog identifier


2

Version

string

Version Identifier for this entry

yyyymmdd

3

HIP

long

Hipparcos Identifier


4

TYC

string

Tycho2 Identifier


5

UCAC

string

UCAC4 Identifier


6

TWOMASS

string

2MASS Identifier


7

SDSS

string

SDSS DR9 Identifier


8

ALLWISE

string

ALLWISE Identifier


9

GAIA

string

GAIA Identifier


10

APASS

string

APASS Identifier


11

KIC

long

KIC Identifier


12

Objtype

string

Object Type


13

Typesrc

string

Source of the object


14

RA

double

Right Ascension epoch 2000

deg

15

Dec

double

Declination epoch 2000

deg

16

Posflag

string

Source of the position


17

pmRA

double

Proper Motion in Right Ascension

mas/yr

18

e_pmRA

double

Uncertainty in PM Right Ascension

mas/yr

19

pmDec

double

Proper Motion in Declination

mas/yr

20

e_pmDec

double

Uncertainty in PM Declination

mas/yr

21

PMFlag

string

Source of the Proper Motion


22

plx

double

Parallax

mas

23

e_plx

double

Error in the parallax

mas

24

PARFlag

string

Source of the parallax


25

GalLong

double

Galactic Longitude

deg

26

GalLat

double

Galactic Latitude

deg

27

EcLong

double

Ecliptic Longitude

deg

28

EcLat

double

Ecliptic Latitude

deg

29

Bmag

float

Johnson B

mag

30

e_Bmag

float

Uncertainty in Johnson B

mag

31

Vmag

float

Johnson V

mag

32

e_Vmag

float

Uncertainty in Johnson V

mag

33

umag

float

Sloan u

mag

34

e_umag

float

Uncertainty in Sloan u

mag

35

gmag

float

Sloan g

mag

36

e_gmag

float

Uncertainty in Sloan g

mag

37

rmag

float

Sloan r

mag

38

e_rmag

float

Uncertainty in Sloan r

mag

39

imag

float

Sloan I

mag

40

e_imag

float

Uncertainty in Sloan I

mag

41

zmag

float

Sloan z

mag

42

e_zmag

float

Uncertainty in Sloan z

mag

43

Jmag

float

2MASS J

mag

44

e_Jmag

float

Uncertainty in 2MASS J

mag

45

Hmag

float

2MASS H

mag

46

e_Hmag

float

Uncertainty in 2MASS H

mag

47

Kmag

float

2MASS K

mag

48

e_Kmag

float

Uncertainty in 2MASS K

mag

49

TWOMflag

string

Quality Flags for 2MASS


50

prox

float

Distance to 2MASS nearest neighbor

arcsec

51

W1Mag

float

WISE W1

mag

52

e_W1Mag

float

Uncertainty in WISE W1

mag

53

W2Mag

float

WISE W2

mag

54

e_W2Mag

float

Uncertainty in WISE W2

mag

55

W3Mag

float

WISE W3

mag

56

e_W3Mag

float

Uncertainty in WISE W3

mag

57

W4mag

float

WISE W4

mag

58

e_W4Mag

float

Uncertainty in WISE W4

mag

59

Gmag

float

GAIA G Mag

mag

60

e_Gmag

float

Uncertainty in GAIA G

mag

61

Tmag

float

TESS Magnitude

mag

62

e_Tmag

float

Uncertainty in TESS Magnitude

mag

63

TESSFlag

string

TESS Magnitude Flag


64

SPFlag

string

Stellar Properties Flag


65

Teff

float

Effective Temperature

K

66

e_Teff

float

Uncertainty in Effective Temperature

K

67

logg

float

log of the Surface Gravity

cgs

68

e_logg

float

Uncertainty in Surface Gravity

cgs

69

M/H

float

Metallicity

dex

70

e_M/H

float

Uncertainty in the Metallicity

dex

71

Rad

float

Radius

solar

72

e_Rad

float

Uncertainty in the Radius

solar

73

Mass

float

Mass

solar

74

e_Mass

float

Uncertainty in the Mass

solar

75

rho

float

Stellar Density

solar

76

e_rho

float

Uncertainty in the Stellar Density

solar

77

LumClass

string

Luminosity Class


78

Lum

float

Stellar Luminosity

solar

79

e_Lum

float

Uncertainty in Luminosity

solar

80

d

float

Distance

pc

81

e_d

float

Uncertainty in the distance

pc

82

e(b-v)

float

Applied Color Excess

mag

83

e_e(b-v)

float

Uncertainty in Applied Color Excess

mag

84

numcont

long

Number of Contamination Sources


85

contratio

float

Contamination Ratio


86

disposition

string

Disposition type


87

dup_id

long

Points to the duplicate object TIC ID


88

priority

double

CTL priority



The following columns have been added to the public release of TICv8 on MAST

...

Some stars will have distinct priorities:

Stars with log(g) values that are greater than 5 have had their priorities set to 0 to avoid biases from poor quality effective temperature, extinction, or parallax measurements. Stars in the specially curated lists are excluded from this scenario.

Stars with ecliptic latitudes (column 28) less than ~6 degrees in absolute value are not expected to be observed as part of the main mission due to a gap in camera coverage between the Southern and Northern observations. Therefore, their Ns values are 0 and thus the priority is 0.

89 eneg_EBV The lower asymmetric error on the color excess. The asymmetric errors are calculated using a Monte-Carlo procedure for stars in CTLv8.01 (see section 3.2.2 of the full documentation).

...