Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: updated missing data description

...

Excerpt

Users of the current PS1 DR2 data should be aware of a few issues and inconsistencies in the data.

  • Approximately 346 4.9 square degrees (10.1% 016% of the survey area) has sources that are partially or completely missing due to various issues in the database population procedures.  These are expected to be filled in during the coming weeks/ months.
  • The stack positions (raStack, decStack) have considerably larger systematic astrometric errors than the mean epoch positions (raMean, decMean).
  • The astrometric and photometric keywords in the image headers are slightly inconsistent with the astrometry and photometry for catalog objects. The catalog quantities are more accurate due to post-image-processing improvements.
  • Some images near the celestial pole have registration issues that lead to poor photometry and astrometry.
  • There are some astrometry issues at the ~0.5" level near the pole (mostly above 85 deg declination) which have caused problems with the stacking. As a result, both warp and stack images may have incorrect WCS, and in extreme cases double objects may be visible in the stacks. There will also be errors in the stack positions (but not mean epoch positions) in the catalogues.
  • FITS image headers use the obsolete PC001001, PC001002, etc., keywords for the WCS. The fluxes have been non-linearly scaled using an asinh transformation. The files also use the tile-compressed image format.  The full skycell FITS images do not have a RADESYS keyword, which leads some software (including DS9 v8) to incorrectly interpret the coordinates as being equinox 1950 rather than equinox 2000.  The fix is to insert the keyword RADESYS = 'FK5' in the header.

...

The current version of the database (released 2019 January 28) is missing data over about 10.1% 016% of the survey (346 4.9 square degrees).  The missing regions lie in areas where either no sources were ingested into the ObjectThin table (only ~1.5 sq deg), where the StackObjectThin objects were not added (~4.1 sq deg), or . Note that an earlier issue where the MeanObject objects are were missing (~341 sq deg). For the stack objects, the object entries are missing in ObjectThin, but they are present in StackObjectThin (and other stack tables).  For the missing mean objects, the problem is that there are entries in ObjectThin but the corresponding magnitude information is missing from MeanObject.  The effective result is that the objects do not show up in searches if any magnitudes or other properties are required (which is the usual case.)over a much larger area) has been fixed.

The figures below show where data are missing. The first figure shows a schematic plot with the locations of missing data.  The other two plots show closeups with more detail. The most noticeable missing areas are long narrow strips in declination.  The approximate boundaries of the missing data in declination strips are given in the table below.

...

The declination cut was not applied in a narrow RA strip between 214 and 216 degrees.  In that region the catalog extends down to declination -36 deg.  There some tables where additional information can be found on objects south of -30 deg (e.g., the Detection table).  This data is unlikely to be of good quality due to uneven sky coverage.  For most purposes data south of -30 deg should be ignored.


Areas missing in long Declination strips
Boundaries of regions with missing data
min(Dec)
[deg]
max(Dec)
[deg]
min(RA)
[deg]
max(RA)
[deg]
Missing objectsNotes
35.4635.50499189.0267.7Stack Objects
35.4635.504990.04725.2Stack Objects24.727.80.068.1Mean Objects24.727.8176.7254.9Mean Objects
37.4037.440.047.2Mean ObjectsDeclination width varies
37.4037.44189.0268.8Mean ObjectsDeclination width varies

Image Removed

Figure showing regions where all objects are missing (red) and some objects are missing (blue).

Image Removed

Figure showing closeups of the density of missing objects in the small holes.

...

31
35.4635.49925.8847.25
76.8878.11123.34126.66
75.4776.40342.51345.00
73.6074.06343.50

345.00

-27.18-26.7276.4076.91


Image Added

Figure showing regions where objects are missing.


Image Added

Figure showing closeups of small holes with missing objects.

Image Added


Figure showing details of missing declination strips.   The top narrow strip is from missing stack objects,
while the other two are missing MeanObject entries. Note that the wide strip varies in declination widthNote the strips are narrow, so the y-scale is much different than the x-scale.

Astrometry differences between stack and mean positions

...