Versions Compared


  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.




HST Proposal Process

The HST Call formally describes the proposal process and review policies each cycle. In particular, Chapter 6.1 covers how the reviews are done, and Chapter 6.2 discusses the selection criteria that we expect panel reviewers and the TAC to use for evaluations. The HST Peer Review Information site has much more detailed information from the Science Policies Group on HST peer review, including some history on the evaluation of the review, more specific guidelines to reviewers, presentations provided at orientation on the observatory status and science activities, lists of previous panelists and chairs, and the proposal processing procedures


The STScI Chief Librarian, Jenny Novacescu, has complied a few articles on doubledual-blind anonymous peer reviews that should be have been useful in our discussions. They are available on Box (, and include crib notes by the Librarian on each article in the See the document Anonymous-Double Blind Review Annotated Bibliography [.docx.]. Before , but before diving into these articles, a place to start might be this article in Science Magazine