...

How do the reviewers assess the proposers' responsible use of funds that are allocated with each science program?

The job of the reviewers is to evaluate the scientific merit of the proposals, and issue a recommendation to the director on whether or not the proposed program is a worthwhile use of our most finite resource: observing time on HST. The funding of accepted proposals will remain, as it has always been, a separate part of the process, completely independent of the review panels and the TAC. Budget proposals will be reviewed by the Financial Review Committee, and will not be anonymous.

What will the implementation process be?

...

How do we deal with continuing programs?

demonstrating the knowledge of whatLet's been done, discuss work in progress by the community or by reference. Justify the science each time they proposediscuss this one, I'm unclear on how continuing programs work now...

How can I be sure that someone won't steal my proposal from a previous cycle?

...