Page History
...
| Pipeline step | NIRISS status | NIRISS comments | NIRCam status | NIRCam comments | MIRI status | MIRI comments | NIRSpec status | NIRSpec comments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assign_wcs |
| Assign WCS indeed adds information to the ASDF name of the files. Tested that ranges of the WCS information made sense. |
|
| some loose ends to tie updone |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| extract_2d |
| This step is not supported for NIRISS/SOSS, and indeed running this steps shows the "not-supported" message. Still, saves an output equal to the input. |
|
| n/a |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| flat_field |
| Flat field is correctly applied to NIRISS/SOSS data. |
|
|
Build 7.5: Failed current validation test | passes for NRS2, but fails for NRS1:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| srctype |
| As stated in the documentation, TSO always defines SRCTYPE to POINT. The pipeline indeed does this for NIRISS/SOSS TSO data. |
|
|
Build 7.5: Logic is not correct, always defaults to POINT, even when provided EXTENDED |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| photom |
| Photometric calibration is performed according to the NIRISS reference files. |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| extract_1d |
| This step currently extracts a big chunk of the whole subarray as a spectrum, which produced order overlap, which makes this step produce an unusable product for science right now. An algorithm is in development for this step. For details, see
|
|
|
Build 7.5: methodology needs to be vetted by TSOWG | additional comments pending |
...
| Pipeline step | NIRISS status | NIRISS comments | NIRCam status | NIRCam comments | MIRI status | MIRI comments | NIRSpec status | NIRSpec comments | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assign_wcs | N/A |
|
| have successfully run imaging TSO simulations through Image2 and TSO3 but no notebooks yet for individual steps. high level checks looked good. | N/A | |||||||||||
| flat_field | N/A |
|
| N/A | ||||||||||||
| photom | N/A |
|
| N/A |
...
| Pipeline step | NIRISS status | NIRISS comments | NIRCam status | NIRCam comments | MIRI status | MIRI comments | NIRSpec status | NIRSpec comments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| outlier_detection |
| Testing and validation done. Found some problems both with the documentation (
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| tso_photometry | N/A |
|
| have successfully run TSO imaging simulations through Image2 and TSO3 but no notebooks yet for individual steps. high level checks looked good. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| extract_1d |
| This step currently extracts a big chunk of the whole subarray as a spectrum, which produced order overlap, which makes this step produce an unusable product for science right now. An algorithm is in development for this step. For details, see
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| white_light |
|
|
|
|
...
