Page History
...
| Pipeline step | NIRISS status | NIRISS comments | NIRCam status | NIRCam comments | MIRI status | MIRI comments | NIRSpec status | NIRSpec comments | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| group_scale |
| The step is supossed to do nothing for NIRISS/SOSS (here, a group = 1 frame). Indeed, nothing changes when running this step, except for the length of the ASDF element in the HDU list object, which is normal. |
| N/A |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| dq_init |
| This step correctly initializes the data-quality flags, as it is supposed to do. However, still not clear what the PIXELDQ mask is reporting. GROUPDQ masks make sense with respect to the reference file bad pixel mask. |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| saturation |
| This step does what is expected to do: it captures saturated pixels and flags them in the GROUPDQ masks. The simulations used for this validation had saturated pixels and they were correctly identified (flagged) by the pipeline. |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| superbias |
|
| N/A |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| reset | N/A | N/A |
| This was tested on a TSO imaging file separately since this step does not currently run by default. The test passed with no issues. | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| linearity |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| rscd | N/A | N/A |
| N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| dark_current |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| refpix |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| jump |
| Step produced no errors. Manually introduced jumps were detected. |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ramp_fitting |
| *rateints files show spikes not seen with my own ramp fits, and do not report timestamps. This has been identified as an awesimsoss header bug. |
| produced rateints with 7.5 and independent linear fits; substantial difference in a subset of data. |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| gain_scale |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
...
