Date
Attendees
- Sarah Kendrew
- Unknown User (birkmann)
- Brian Brooks
- Nikolay Nikolov
- Everett Schlawin
- Leonardo Ubeda
- Michael Regan
Apologies
Meeting agenda:
- News & Announcements.
- General TSO WG work updates.
- Documenting TSO timestamp generation
- NIRCam TSO flux variation causes (Everett)
- Roundtable check-in.
- Closing remarks.
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
5 mins | 1. News & announcements | In the interview stage of the MIRI technical position hire. Nestor & Sarah met with MESA leadership yesterday (Diaz) and updated her on the progress in our work for this fiscal year. | |
TSO work tasks updates | |||
2. 1/f noise |
| ||
3. Non-linearity as measured by TSOs (Espinoza) | Using Nestor's notebook as a template to look at the NIRSpec non-linearity performance in the WASP-121 data. Took a long time to process (47 hrs). | ||
4. TSO Monitor | Still waiting to hear from ITSD, Meeting with Klaus and Massimo to see what level of public visibility of the page is appropriate. All of the data being queries & shown is already publicly available but it is apparently still somewhat sensitive. | ||
5. Cosmic ray routine |
| ||
6. TSO Timestamp generation (helpdesk ticket) | Everett filed a Helpdesk ticket (INC0188726 for those with access) to report that the data in the INT_TIMES extension for TSOs is not consistent with the header keywords (BSTRTIME, BENDTIME, BARTDELT). The difference he finds is ~240 seconds. Brian Brooks has investigated and found other datasets where this is the case. SK has had a report from a MIRI PI as well. The INT_TIMES extension has the most reliable data. A possible workaround is to re-populate the header keywords based on the data in the INT_TIMES extension. Action to write a short note about this for either JDocs or Knowledge Base to have a reference for the user while the cause of the issue is being investigated. SK will check where best to place this. | ||
7. NIRCam flux variation (anti-)correlated with focal plane assembly houseing temperature | Looking for relevant telemetry to de-trend some light curves - in the smallest subarrays see a slow downward trend. Found an anti-correlation with the mnemonic that traces the focal plane housing (FPHA) temperature, which I turn appears to correlate with the ASIC temperature. The ASIC is not temperature controlled, and we know from lab testing that T control is important. So that is unfortunate. It's important to look at the actual geometry of the focal plane system and where the sensors are. The temperature recorded in the mnemonic is that of the thermistor, not the focal plane itself. No idea of the actual causative mechanism behind this - right now this is just a correlation. Need to dig further to understand better. Mike Regan suggests meeting with Eddie to look at the detain more detail. | ||
TSO Roundtable check-in | |||
NIRCam | SPAR reviews and reviews of CAL programs. | ||
NIRISS | |||
NIRSpec | |||
MIRI | |||
2 mins | 4. Closing Remarks | None. |