You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

A first stab at issues reviewers should be aware of. We will recommend these guidelines be added to the orientation material and sent out prior to the triage review. We may ask for a streamlining of orientation material, so this doesn't get lost in the flood of documentation.

  • Primary objective is to review the science and not the scientist(s).
  • Past usage not a concern any longer.
    • availably of help
  • need to trim orientation material – note.
  • note- have smo review the checklist-- need more specifics
  • specific directions to the Chairs to cutoff/redirect discussion when goes astray...
  • don't spend time trying to figure out who's doing this
  • flag non-compliant proposals: The director will decide what to do, 
  • expect more comments to proposers if they've not anonymized themselves sufficiently

  • No labels