You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 7 Next »

Date

 

Attendees

Goals

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
Detector Settling TimesTom G.
  • Tom: "I think it would be useful to compare info and to eventually give informed 
    advice to observers about how much time the different instruments need to 
    settle to XXX ppm at the start of a TSO exposure."
 Persistence Mitigation Kevin
  • HST/WFC3 persistence mitigation using internal Tungsten lamp
  • Can this be applied to NIR instruments with JWST?
  • Could turn on lamp and cycle detector while we wait for the science to start

TSO Pipeline Status
  • CALWEBB_DETECTOR1
    • Data quality, saturation check, error initialization, NIR/MIR corrections, slope fitting
    • Baseline: Complete
    • Optimal: Build 7.2+
  • CALWEBB_SPEC2
    • WCS info, subwindow extraction, flat field correction, flux calibration, rectified 2D product
    • Baseline: Complete
    • Optimal: Build 7.2+
  • CALWEBB_TSO3
    • Baseline (Outlier rejection, no BG subtraction, summation spectral extraction)
      • Build 7.2 (to be delivered Oct 5, 2018)
    • Optimal (Outlier rejection, col-by-col BG subtraction, optimal spectral extraction)
      • Build 7.3+ (TBD)
  • ExoCTK
    • Light curve fitting (in-house module using BATMAN, MC-Cubed, EMCEE, Dynesty)
    • Retrievals (e.g. CHIMERA, PLATON)

Paper
  • Do we want a paper describing the algorithms used in JWST TSO pipeline?




Action items

  •  
  • No labels