Dual Anonymous Reviews

STScI, September 25th 2019

Bahcall Auditorium


Morning:  Facts and foundations – issues, actions and community reception

Time

Speaker(s)

Title

08:30

Ken Sembach

Welcome & introduction

08:45

Stefanie Johnson (Colorado)

Unconscious bias in reviews

09:15

Neill Reid (STScI)

HST TAC structure and proposal stats – before and after

09:30

Arvind Parmar (ESA)

ESA AO outcomes

09:45

Louis Strolger (STScI)

Preparing the community

10:15

Christina Richey (JPL), Rupali Chandar (Toledo), Brian Williams (GSFC)

Community reactions

10:45


Coffee

11:00

Svea Hernandez, Crystal Mannfolk, Greg Snyder (STScI)

Panel support perspective + levelers

11:45

Priya Natarajan (Yale), Saurabh Jha (Rutgers), Rupali Chandar (Toledo)

Panel chairs & panelist perspective

12:30

Jessica Kirk (Memphis)

Watching the TAC

13:00


 Lunch


Afternoon: Spreading the word – adapting the process to other facilities

Time

Mode

Title

13:30

Molly Peeples (STScI)

Lessons learned so far from the HST TAC process

14:00

Breakout sessions:

3-4 sub-groups

Challenges for individual observatories – discussion

15:30

Plenary session

Challenges – report out

16:00


Discussion summary & feedback to NASA Astrophysics Division

Breakout sessions will be in the Lyman Spitzer Boardroom, N420, S322 and Cafe Con, all in STScI’s Muller Building.


Reference materials

Report from the Working Group for Anonymising Proposals

HST Cycle 27 Anonymous Proposal Reviews -  documentation for submitting and reviewing Cycle 27 proposals

  • No labels