You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »


Morning:  Facts and foundations – issues, actions and community reception

Time

Speaker(s)

Title

Notes

08:45

Ken Sembach

Welcome & introduction


09:00

Stefanie Johnson, Univ of Colorado

Unconscious bias in reviews

Basic intro

09:30

Neill Reid

HST TAC structure and proposal stats

Summary of HST TAC structure and metrics

09:45

Louis Strolger

Preparing the community and lessons learned

Building the process, establishing guidelines and documentation, levelers, tracking results

10:15

Panel: TBD

Community reactions

Perspective on community interactions

10:45


coffee


11:00

3-4 PSS & levelers

Panel support perspective + levelers

What was it like to support the TAC in this format? Challenges and differences

11:45

3-4 Cy 26 & 27 chairs/panelists

Panel chairs & panelist perspective

What was it like to review proposals in this format? Challenges and differences

12:30

Jessica Kirk, Univ. of Memphis

Watching the TAC

CcIomparing cycles 25, 26 and 27

13:00

Lunch




Afternoon: Spreading the word – adapting the process to other facilities

Time

Mode

Title

Notes

13:30

Molly Peeples

Lessons so far from the HST TAC

Over-litigating, false assumptions, framing proposals

14:00

Breakout sessions:

3-4 sub-groups

Challenges for individual observatories – discussion

Identify 3-4 per group, includes areas where ST could do better

15:30

Plenary session

Challenges – report out

Summary from each group followed by general discussion

16:00


coffee


16:15

Breakout sessions:

3-4 sub-groups

What can be implemented?

What remain as challenges?

Condense previous discussions

17:00

Plenary session

Summary and next steps

1-page summaries from each sub-group


  • No labels